Project 3a
To forecast our firm’s demand for a product in order to plan future operations and also planning the course of action in various possible scenarios. Develop a DSS and implement it.
TID - Total Industry demand for the overall industry is important to determine overall market growth.
· Estimated Average Advertising (a measure of the average amount spent on advertising by the industry)
· Estimated Average Price (a measure of the average price charged for the product by the industry)
RD - Relative Demand for any quarter; RD= FD/AFD where FD is our firm’s demand and AFD is the average demand per firm in the industry
· Prel – Relative price (P/ AvgP), where P is price charged by our firm and AvgP is the average price charged by the industry
· Arel - Relative Advertising amount (A/ AvgA), where A is advertising amount spent by our firm and AvgA is the average advertising amount spent by the firms in the industry
· RD1 – Relative demand for the previous quarter
MS - Market Share; MS= RD/N
Model 1 for TID:
From our analysis in the previous project
Estimated TID=14218.07 + 645.98(Quarter)
¨ Regression analysis was performed using only Quarter as the independent variable
¨ The P value for the intercept is 0 and the P value for Quarter is .001, this shows that the variable “Quarter #” is Significant and there is a no chance of making a Type I error.
¨ R Squared is 48% indicates that 48% of the variance in TID has been explained
¨ This model is more useful for long term forecasting
Estimated TID = 130249 +132 (Quarter) - 358 (Avg_Price) + 0.263(Avg_Adv)
¨ The P values were all very low except for the variable quarter (0.2187). This indicates that Quarter is an insignificant variable.
¨ The R Squared for the model is 90.7%, which means that 90.7% of the variance in the TID has been explained.
¨
The effect of the variable quarter is already
explained by the other 2 variables
Therefore the new model without the “Quarter” variable is
¨ Estimated TID= 164336.17 - 445.17(Avg. Price) +0.26(Avg. Adv.)
¨ The R Squared for the model is 89.7%, which means that 89.7% of the variance in the TID has been explained. The value dropped slightly as we have one less variable.
¨ The P values were all very low. This shows that the model is very accurate and has a low probability of error
¨ This model is more useful in short term forecasting
The estimated regression equation for the RD model is RD= 16.13 –16.44(PREL) +0.77(AREL) +0.53(RD1).
· The P values for all of the variables are extremely low, and hence all the variables are significant.
· R squared is 95.7% suggests 95.7% of the variance been explained.
Firm Demand (FD):
Using the above equations, we can arrive at FD
Estimated FD = TID x MS, since MS =RD/N where N is the number of firms in the industry
Estimated FD = (130249 +132 (Quarter) - 358 (Avg_Price) + 0.263(Avg_Adv)) x 1.612 – 1.644(PREL) + 0.077(AREL) +0.53(RD1)
· The implementation model is used to help forecast Firm Demand. The values in the model can be changed at the user’s discretion.
Explanation of the DSS model:
Inputs |
|
|
Outputs |
|
Quarter# "t" |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Industry Demand
|
30520.14 |
Estimates for Industry (for Qtr
"t") |
|
|
|
|
Estimated
Average Price |
366 |
|
Relative Demand |
1.23 |
Estimated
Average Advertising |
105000 |
|
|
|
Number
of Firms in Industry |
10 |
|
Market Share |
0.123 |
|
|
|
|
|
Our Decisions (for Qtr. "t") |
|
|
Our Firm's Estimated Demand
|
3755.30 |
Price |
359.00 |
|
|
|
Advertising |
100000.00 |
|
Average
Demand |
3052.014 |
|
|
|
|
|
Historical Data for Qtr = t-1
|
|
|
|
|
Our
firm's Demand |
3000 |
|
|
|
Total
Industry Demand |
32850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculations |
|
|
|
|
Relative
Price (Qtr = t) |
0.98 |
|
|
|
Relative
Advertising (Qtr = t) |
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
Demand (Qtr = t-1) |
3285 |
|
|
|
Our Firm's
Relative Demand (Qtr = t-1) |
0.91 |
|
|
|
·
These are our potential
decisions
·
These inputs are from our
historical database
·
These are our outputs
External Variables: (Factors controlled by environment)
·
These factors can be determined by descriptive
statistics or looking at estimated trends.
(Click here for assistance in choosing inputs)
Estimated
Average Price |
Estimated
Average Advertising |
Number of
Firms in Industry |
Variables that we can control: (Our decisions)
· These are determined through analysis
Our Price |
Our Advertising |
Historical Data (Previous Quarter’s data)
· We have this data available (Click here for the data)
Our firm's Demand |
Total Industry Demand |
Outputs:
· TID
· MS
· FD
(Click
here for a functional DSS model)
Use of the model:
This model can be used to predict various market scenarios and how our firm can react to it. It helps us to determine optimum values for our decision variables.
Sensitivity Analysis :
· Helps us determine the effect of changing price and advertising inputs on the firm’s demand and market share
· Step 1: Attain a market share of at least 10.5% by changing only the price variable . The resulting price was found to be $359
· Step 2: Attain a market share of at least 10.5% by changing only the advertising expenditure. The resulting amount was found to be $140000
Sensitivity
analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
Using
expected averages of price and advertising
( 363 & 110000), |
|||||
firm's
advertising kept constant |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price
sensitivity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
INITIAL |
Trial I |
Trial II |
Trial III |
Trial IV |
Price |
365 |
364 |
361 |
360 |
359 |
Adv. |
100000 |
100000 |
100000 |
100000 |
100000 |
MS |
0.079033 |
0.083577 |
0.09721 |
0.101754 |
0.106298 |
Firm
Demand |
2200.997 |
2364.756 |
2880.309 |
3060.252 |
3244.241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using
expected averages of price and advertising
( 363 & 110000), |
|||||
keeping
price constant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
sensitivity |
|
|
|
||
|
INITIAL |
Trial I |
Trial II |
Trial III |
Trial IV |
Price |
365 |
365 |
365 |
365 |
365 |
Adv. |
100000 |
105000 |
110000 |
115000 |
140000 |
MS |
0.079033 |
0.082575 |
0.086116 |
0.089658 |
0.107 |
Firm
Demand |
2200.997 |
2406.974 |
2622.159 |
2846.552 |
4106.64 |
Goal Seek:
· To achieve a market share of 11.5% - using values of expected averages of price and advertising (363 & 110000)
· Step 1 : Keeping Advertising constant and see by how much the price has to be reduced in order to achieve our goal
· Step 2 : Keeping price constant and see by how much the advertisement spending has to be increased in order to achieve our goal
|
Initial |
* By
changing price |
** By
changing Adv. |
` |
|
keeping Adv constant |
keeping price constant |
Inputs |
|
|
|
Quarter# "t" |
20 |
20 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
Estimates
for Industry (for Qtr "t") |
|
|
|
Estimated
Average Price |
363 |
363 |
363 |
Estimated
Average Advertising |
110000 |
110000 |
110000 |
Number of
Firms in Industry |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
Your
Decisions (for Qtr. "t") |
|
|
|
Price |
359 |
357.09 |
359 |
Advertising |
100000 |
100000 |
112000 |
|
|
|
|
Historical
Data for Qtr = t-1 |
|
|
|
Your
Demand |
3000 |
3000 |
3000 |
Total
Industry Demand |
32850 |
32850 |
32850 |
Outputs |
|
|
|
Total
Industry Demand |
30520 |
31373 |
33640 |
|
|
|
|
Relative
Demand |
1.06 |
1.15 |
1.15 |
|
|
|
|
Market
Share |
10.63% |
11.50% |
11.5% |
|
|
|
|
Your
Firm's Estimated Demand |
3244 |
3608 |
3862 |
From sensitivity analysis, we determined Price to be $359 and advertising amount spent to be 100000 to achieve a MS of at least 10.5%. Keeping these values constant, we will look at various scenarios
· Scenario1 (Most Likely): Estimated average price is $363 and Estimated average advertising is 110000. Our MS is 10.6%
· Scenario2 (Worst Case): Estimated average price is $360 and Estimated average advertising is 115000. Our MS is 9%
· Scenario 3 (Best Case): Estimated average price is $366 and Estimated average advertising is 105000. Our MS increases 12.3%
Scenario
Summary |
|
|
|
|
Scenario
|
One |
Two |
Three |
|
Changing Cells: |
Most Likely |
Worst Case |
Best Case |
|
Estimated Average Price |
363 |
360 |
366 |
|
Estimated Average Advertising |
110000 |
115000 |
105000 |
|
Result Cells: |
|
|
|
Average |
Our Firm's Estimated Demand |
3244.24 |
2735.33 |
3755.30 |
3244.96 |
Market Share |
0.106 |
0.090 |
0.123 |
0.106 |